Posted by Johnnymac | March 30, 2008 5:54 PM
Filed Under Uncategorized

So the Horns lost and, combined with Louisville (and possibly, as of this writing, Kansas), my Final Four brackets are in shambles. Going into the weekend, I could have picked all 4 and now it looks like UCLA might be the only one I got right.


What a great day!

UPDATE: Of course Davidson didn’t blow up my bracket, because they executed what was probably one of the biggest fuck-yourself and choke jobs I have ever seen from a basketball team down by only two with the ball and 17 seconds left on the clock. Are you kidding me? What the fuck was that?

* Sorry for the language, I am being candid. It was that bad.

UPDATE2: How did they screw it up? Well, for one, Stephen Curry might be the best player on the team, but sometimes the best player needs not to be selfish. 17 seconds is an ETERNITY. Shit, Tyus Edney only needed 4.8 seconds! And Edney did it right – take the ball down the floor and right into the middle. 4 things could happen, and 3 of them are good: 1.) The inside shot could be made to tie the game and send it into ovetime, 2.) He could miss but get fouled and get to shoot two free throws to tie the game, 3.) He could make the shot AND get fouled and have a chance to win it by one point, or 4.) He could miss and not get fouled and lose the game.

But if you take it inside, at least you have a 75% chance of something good happening. Dribbling around outside of the NBA three point line and then throwing up a prayer after wasting 16 of 17 seconds on the clock has a very low chance of success.

Posted by Johnnymac | March 29, 2008 12:27 PM
Filed Under Uncategorized

Talk about stupid toy company executives and even stupider parents who buy their wares. I am very glad I don’t have a little girl.

Posted by Johnnymac | March 29, 2008 11:32 AM
Filed Under Uncategorized

PokerStars Game #16336526460: Tournament #82723027- Level IV (50/100) – 2008/03/29 – 12:31:03 (ET)
Table ‘82723027 1′ 9-max Seat #9 is the button
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to IAGJohnnyMac [6h 6s]

Hmmm, I think I’ll just throw this away and let these two idiots keep beating on each other. I’m a bit shortstacked and I don’t want to throw away chips in the off chance of flopping a set…

rodafafale: folds
lowriderhd23: folds
IAGJohnnyMac: folds
ksquared1524: folds
Mr_Gustav: raises 200 to 300
edly68: calls 200
*** FLOP *** [6d 6c 8s]

DOH!

Posted by Johnnymac | March 27, 2008 12:31 PM
Filed Under Uncategorized

I thought it was at least somewhat amusing.

Posted by Dr Fro | March 17, 2008 8:53 AM
Filed Under Uncategorized

A Mother’s View of a Word That Wounds: Retard
By Theresa Howard, advertising reporter for USA TODAY

You are such a retard.

You’ve heard the expression. Sometimes it’s preceded by an expletive, as in “you’re such a f–ing retard.” Either way, with or without the curse word, it’s a harsh statement. But one, it seems, that’s become increasingly acceptable. So much so that in one recent week I kept track of how many times I heard it and who said it. I heard it daily – whether it was a colleague, a neighbor talking to his dog, an actor from a hit TV show during an interview with me, a top level advertising executive, young men playfully swapping insults or Tony Soprano to his son after a botched suicide attempt.

Last year, the r-word was in the title of a Two and a Half Men episode It’s a word that, unlike “pimp” or the n-word, is always derogatory. For reasons that I can’t understand, pimp has become synonymous with style. The n-word, for a handful of African-Americans, is a term of endearment – until someone outside the circle uses it. Then it becomes derogatory.

But no matter how or by whom the r-word is used, it’s always in a negative context. You don’t hear, “What a great idea, that’s so retarded.” You don’t hear, “Awesome catch – what a retard move.”

While some are advocating that the n-word be banished from America’s lexicon, who is the voice for the 7.5 million Americans with intellectual disabilities who truly are mentally retarded? Who is defending their dignity while everyday folks – educated adults at that – take a term that clinically applies to the disabled and use it as an insult?

What’s my fascination with the r-word? I take it very personally. And I’m not a person who is easily offended. I am, however, the mother of a 6-month-old daughter who was born with Down Syndrome. Lydia Catherine is sweet. She’s got a warm smile and very knowing blue eyes. She’s got a subtle little dimple and a tiny tuft of strawberry blonde hair that swirls into one single swoop into the air.

When she looks at me, I feel like she can see all the fears, concerns, doubts and questions that swim around in my heart and my mind every day. Will she be smart enough to know when she hears people say the word “retard” that they are talking about her?

This is not new territory for me. I grew up the sibling of a Down syndrome sister. Catherine Anne was 41 when she passed away four years ago. She was born at a time when “mongolian idiot” was the operative term, and doctors suggested to my parents to leave her behind and she’d be taken care of. It really meant she would have been institutionalized. They didn’t listen. Catherine lived with my parents until the day she died.

For as long as I can remember, I corrected people when they said the r-word. I flashed dirty looks to people who stared. I told parents to tell their child that it’s not polite. Ever gregarious, Catherine would smile at strangers, many of whom would be so uncomfortable that they didn’t know what to do. Even after Catherine passed away, I continued to correct people for a few years. Then I got tired. I no longer felt it was my battle.

Until Dec. 10, when Lydia was born. My journey has begun all over again, this time with me as the mother and my older daughter, Sofia, as the sibling. If I was protective of my sister, I am almost scared of how protective I will be for Lydia and her own sister. But as she grows up in a time when “retard” is a socially acceptable slur, professional organizations are trying to change the clinical term. Last November, the American Association on Mental Retardation changed its name to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. The Special Olympics is advocating that “retarded” be dropped from the vernacular.

Fixing the terminology is only a start. The bigger issue is acceptance of people with disabilities.

Do your part. Don’t stare. Say hello. Be inclusive. And when you want to insult someone’s intelligence, remember to use a different word.

Posted by Dr Fro | March 15, 2008 2:32 PM
Filed Under Uncategorized

I’ve had two realizations in Omaha 8 lately. Like most Omaha 8 advice, it comes from a perspective of comparison to Holdem strategy.

First of all, when you get in a raising war in Holdem, you ask yourself, “does he have the nuts?” When you get in a raising war in Omaha 8, you should assume he has the nuts. What you should ask is “even though we both have the nuts, which one of us has the better re-draw?” When two people flop the same nut straight, but only guy has a draw to the low or to the flush, that guy is in an incredible situation – one better than having a dominating hand in Holdem. Even the dominating hand can get sucked out on, but in the situation we are talking about here, one player has a worst case scenario on the flop of splitting the pot. He could win 3/4 of the pot. Best case scenario is felting your opponent. And, unlike in Holdem, it is easier to get your unwitting opponent to hand you all of his chips. Advice: nuts is schutz unless you have draws to boot.

Here is the second realization. I have been asked how to play flopped top two pair in Omaha 8 compared to Holdem, particularly when your opponent represents strength. In Holdem, you play them pretty strong, particularly against a weak field that overplays top pair top kicker. In Omaha 8, you need to ask the following:

1- Do you have a re-draw to a higher high hand?

2- Do you have draw to the low?
3- Based on the board, do you put your opponent on a set?

I first answer question #3. If the board is 25J, you have to put your heavy betting opponent on a set. Against a set (let’s assume a best case scenario of 222), you basically have 2 outs twice. You are in bad shape. Thus, I do not believe you can call. The best hand you might have is J5A3 with a flush draw which gives you 16 outs twice to the low and 9 outs twice to the high. It is tough math to figure out the odds of scooping vs splitting vs losing, but my amateur math puts this at roughly 23% chance to scoop, 48% chance to split and a 29% chance to lose the whole pot. That is negative EV and it is the best case scenario! If you put him on something less than a set, you may be in good shape, but honestly, what Omaha player is going to be betting it up with top pair? Really!

That’s my 2 cents anyway.

Next Page »